Why Pit bulls should not be banned Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Why Pit bulls should non be banned - Essay ExampleThe controversy surrounding particular var. of grade bulls is hidden from nobody these days. It is believed that the polemical rumors intended to attach a horrendous and notorious reputation to these quest fors are specially appreciated by those who do not own one of these themselves. In contrast, the proponents of check bull bans argue that dog snatch epidemic has become a recognized problem in the US lately and it is high era now that weight actions at superior level be made to pin down the reports of cavum bulls killing and maiming great deal. Facts and discussion presented in this essay are meant to illuminate the reality of the claim that pit bulls should not be banned rather efforts should be directed at educating the dog owners and state and passing the strictest sad and dog control laws. There is an increasing need to acknowledge the fact that on grounds of only when a few nasty and sorry incidents, not all pit bu lls should be banned because irrational aggression is not a part of their nature and they tend to attack only under current stressful or perilous circumstances. Not just pit bull but any otherwise dog also would feel compelled to attack upon being annoyed by owners or other people who are not properly educated about a certain treats specifics which implies that people are to be blamed for the pit bull bite problem and not the entire breed itself. The idea of banning pit bulls should be condemned by everyone as one credit line against implementation of breed specific laws reasonably suggests that banning a breed is like human racial discrimination (Phillips). ... roponents of pit bull bans claim that not only pit bulls but all nigh related breeds should be banned which reflects a severe violation of animal rights because if it is really desired to put an end to the dog bite issues in the US, then those criminal minded dog owners should be apprehended and interrogated who subjec t the pit bulls to insanely hard to believe cruel and atrocious treatment as a way of qualification them violently dangerous. Why pit bulls are judged in such a negative and biased agency and arguments are made to ban them when they are not the culprits in the first place but absolved victims of severe abuse and cruelty? The proponents of pit bull bans should actually question their own flawed argument to ban pit bulls and their closely related breeds (Phillips). Another popular argument enthusiastically spread by the proponents of pit bull bans is related to the extreme danger associated with pit bulls because apparently this danger is so hygienic established that these dogs are held responsible for about 75% of all reported canine-inflicted human deaths in the ultimo two decades (Phillips). What is sad is that the large group of advocates openly supporting the breed bans also includes some esteem figures like Ingrid Newkirk whose opinions are trusted and considered valid. Bu t the important thing is not to blindly believe soul elses beliefs but to responsibly take up an issue to explore it in an impartial elan and reach decisions as objectively as possible. Considering the long history of cruel treatment of pit bulls at hands of the inhuman owners, the banning argument loses its validity along with the claim that pit bulls and other closely related breeds account for majority of all canine-inflicted deaths reported in the US. This is because